Givmark

Identity system · Edition 01 · September 2026

A mark of
considered trust.

The precision of an assay office. The openness of a public standard.

The mark

A hallmark, not a tick.

A hexagonal perimeter holds a struck diamond: evidence examined, then marked. Do not stretch, rotate, add shadows or change the geometry. Clear space: half the seal width. Seal minimum: 16px. Wordmark minimum width: 120px.

ink sealInk
teal sealTeal
reversed sealReversed
Seal at 16 pixels16px
Seal at 24 pixels24px
Seal at 32 pixels32px
Seal at 48 pixels48px
Seal at 64 pixels64px
Seal at 96 pixels96px
Givmark horizontal lockup

Use ink on paper; reversed on ink; teal on pale surfaces. The SVG wordmarks embed an editable font for browser independence. For print applications that cannot read embedded webfonts, install the included Fraunces font before converting text to outlines.

Colour

Quiet foundations.
A meaningful accent.

Paper#FAF8F5Page and reversed text
Ink#1C2B2APrimary text and deep sections
Teal#2A7A6FVerified state and action
Amber#E8A44APending state, with label
Slate#65716ESecondary text
Silver#A4AEAANon-text details
Mist#E8ECE7Secondary surfaces

Never pure black or white. Silver is for non-text detail. Amber must carry a Pending label. Teal never confers verification by colour alone.

Typography

A considered hierarchy.

Manrope / narrative and interface

Evidence earns trust.

Headlines 48–144px. Body 16–21px. Labels 14px; 12px for secondary metadata.

Fraunces / wordmark and assurance

Givmark. A clearer view.

JetBrains Mono / IDs and hashes

GM–DEMO–0001

Verification states

The mark needs a record.

i badge design specimenii badge design specimenpending badge design specimen

These are design specimens, not issued verification. Tier I and Tier II definitions remain pending. A production badge requires the real record ID, date, scope, status and professional determination. Pending is not verified.

Voice

Say what the evidence supports.

Use

“$557bn was the estimated total of US charitable giving in 2023.” Cite Giving USA inline.

“Anomalies are signals for professional review.”

“AI assists the analysis. A professional makes the determination.”

Avoid

“Billions disappear into unverified charities.”

“34% of charities are fraudulent.”

“AI proves impact. Verification guarantees funding.”

British English. Declarative, evidence-led. No emoji, hype or invented assurance. Distinguish document review from field evaluation. The founder’s professional qualification is personal; do not imply ICAEW endorsement.

Component specimens

The system in use.

Button / primary
Join the waitlist
Button / secondary
View methodology
Button / disabled
Joining…
Input / default
you@charity.org
Input / invalid
invalid-addressEnter a valid email address.
Badge / verified
Verified specimen
Badge / pending
Pending
Tag
Financial integrity
Card
Evidence reviewed
Annual accounts and trustee report.
StatCard
$557bn

Estimated US giving in 2023. Giving USA 2024.

Eyebrow
Professional accountability
DimensionCard

Financial integrity

Accounts, ratios and anomaly screening.

VerifiedBadge / Tier I
Tier I design specimen
VerifiedBadge / Tier II
Tier II design specimen
VerifiedBadge / pending
Pending design specimen
Seal / micro
Givmark hallmark
Wordmark
Givmark
Verification metadata
GM–DEMO–0001
0x7a2f…91bc
Scope: document review

This standalone document displays static specimens. The website’s /brand page contains the interactive React components.

Make it consistent.

Complete brand asset packseal-ink.svgseal-teal.svgseal-reversed.svgseal-micro.svgwordmark-ink.svgwordmark-teal.svgwordmark-reversed.svgbadge-i-specimen.svgbadge-ii-specimen.svgbadge-pending-specimen.svgtokens.jsontokens.cssmethodology-draft.md